And then, I wonder, what is to privatize public goods? To do enrich a few individuals at the expens

Tuesday, May 27, 2014 Make your homepage AgoraVox Previous Editions of the day Monday, May 26, 2014 Sunday, May 25, 2014 Saturday, May 24, 2014 Friday, May 23, 2014 Thursday, May 22, 2014 Wednesday, May 21, 2014 Tuesday, May 20, 2014 Monday, May 19, 2014 Sunday, May 18 2014 Saturday, May 17, 2014 Contacts
Of 'your Leisure Articles Gossip Cinema Fame & Tulips Unbelievable but true! The cartoon of the day fashion trends and Publications AgoraVox Reviews Satire Music and Entertainment Sports Travel About Us About Us Contact Us Editorial Policy Network AgoraVox Partners News and gleanings Spinoza Global Voices Meetings Agora Launching of the European Initiative for Media Pluralism Read all the RDV agora ... European Year of Citizens Make a donation
The Telecom case is the perfect crime: none of the protagonists of the story is the murderess, but having contributed to the crisis of what was once a great and imported technology group in our country. Richard Iacona could not hear Prodi and Ciampi Dragons author of the first wave of privatization of our country (that has allowed us to join the Euro, however, depriving us of important assets).
But in the episode yesterday we heard the views of former Telecom executives (as Roberto variety store Di Iurio), D'Alema (his government did not oppose the escalation in debt Colaninno), Tronchetti Provera (which claims all its management). And even outside observers such as former Senator PD reporter today Maximum Mucchetti, which in recent variety store weeks had allegedly submitted a draft law on the mechanism of 'tender offer, which would have forced the Spaniards aversare more money to take Telecom. The numbers can be interpreted in various ways: Ankle used them to demonstrate its good management, with investments in technology and where the sale of properties have served to stay in a market (telecommunications) no more monopoly.
But the numbers say even before that Telecom had 120,000 employees and 50,000 now. Before that he was 8 billion in debt now 25. Telecom was a company with a strong presence in the world, and today its market is mostly in Italian and foreign companies could be sold off to raise cash. How to Telecom Argentina and Telecom Brazil. Whose fault? Prodi that yields Telecom Private and scalable, giving control to the Lambs with a handful of actions? Management Colaninno, who climbed to the debt with the non-opposition of D'Alema and has been selling variety store real estate for Telecom 5 billion in two years? Properties that were our own, paid for with public money. Of Trochetti, who was president variety store from 2001 to 2006? Each of the actors has dumped the blame on others: Trochetti policy, which has hampered the project with Murdoch, for a unified platform with which he wanted to convey, on the internet, television content. Project variety store hampered by the left but, presumably, also from the right Berlusconi. D'Alema and Prodi to blame claims its neutrality: we are opposed to older entrepreneurs variety store in the parlor, who did not want the captains variety store courageous as they were entering Colaninno Telecom. Ankle, who said he was a stranger to espionage Tavaroli (and has not even been investigated in the story), did not explain what he pushed the head of his security to make those files. Unbeknownst to her? And for whom? D'Alema, as I have read today, neutral to the market and strong shareholder, do not explain whether their neutrality is a good thing or a bad thing for the country.
Telecom that we would have today if Bernabe had managed to carry out his project (the merger Telecom Tim) at its meeting April 99 went down in history as the night of the long knives? Iacona variety store also addressed the topic of privatization: the ones made in Italy with ideological fury. There have been a good or a bad thing? In England also wanted to privatize the forests, and in the meantime have gone to private mails, railways and energy management. Yet the bills are more expensive. Yet the British state spends more money than before in subsidies to private transport companies, because private, without public money, it is not able to make investments. variety store
And then, I wonder, what is to privatize public goods? To do enrich a few individuals at the expense of the majority of citizens. He spoke at the end of the service the economist variety store Mariana Mazzucato, author of the book "The state contractor": variety store we